Comparing and contrasting the views of great philosophers plato and aristotle

The Inquisition Strikes Again Mar. There are times when modern scientists act like members of the Inquisition. Such situations can result in people getting removed from their positions in the scientific community, courses being shut down, scientists being fired, or papers being retracted. Unfortunately, it has happened again, resulting in another scientific paper being retracted.

Comparing and contrasting the views of great philosophers plato and aristotle

These features represent the contributions of scholars of many generations and countries, as does the ongoing attempt to correct for corruption. Important variant readings and suggestions are commonly printed at the bottom of each page of text, forming the apparatus criticus.

In the great majority of cases only one decision is possible, but there are instances—some of crucial importance—where several courses can be adopted and where the resulting readings have widely differing import.


The work of the translator imports another layer of similar judgments. Some Greek sentences admit of several fundamentally different grammatical construals with widely differing senses, and many ancient Greek words have no neat English equivalents. A notable artifact of the work of translators and scholars is a device of selective capitalization sometimes employed in English.

Others have employed a variant of this convention in which capitalization is used to indicate a special way in which Plato is supposed to have thought of the forms during a certain period i.

Still others do not use capital letters for any such purpose. Readers will do best to keep in mind that such devices are in any case only suggestions. In recent centuries there have been some changes in the purpose and style of English translations of ancient philosophy.

The great Plato translation by Benjamin Jowett —93for example, was not intended as a tool of scholarship; anyone who would undertake such a study already knew ancient Greek.

Comparing and contrasting the views of great philosophers plato and aristotle

At the other extreme was a type of translation that aimed to be useful to serious students and professional philosophers who did not know Greek; its goal was to indicate as clearly as possible the philosophical potentialities of the text, however much readability suffered in consequence.

Exemplars of this style, which was much in vogue in the second half of the 20th century, are the series published by the Clarendon Press and also, in a different tradition, the translations undertaken by followers of Leo Strauss — Except in a few cases, however, the gains envisioned by this notion of fidelity proved to be elusive.

This is particularly true of the short, Socratic dialogues. In the case of works that are large-scale literary masterpieces, such as the Phaedrus, a translation of course cannot match the artistry of the original.

Finally, because translators of difficult technical studies such as the Parmenides and the Sophist must make basic interpretive decisions in order to render any English at all, reading their work is very far from reading Plato.

In the case of these dialogues, familiarity with commentaries and other secondary literature and a knowledge of ancient Greek are highly desirable.

Comparing and contrasting the views of great philosophers plato and aristotle

Yet he also made notoriously negative remarks about the value of writing. Similarly, although he believed that at least one of the purposes—if not the main purpose—of philosophy is to enable one to live a good life, by composing dialogues rather than treatises or hortatory letters he omitted to tell his readers directly any useful truths to live by.

Plato conversing with his pupils, mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century bce. Moreover, it is a possession that each person must win for himself. The writing or conversation of others may aid philosophical progress but cannot guarantee it.

Contact with a living person, however, has certain advantages over an encounter with a piece of writing. As Plato pointed out, writing is limited by its fixity: So it is only natural that Plato had limited expectations about what written works could achieve.

Scientific Method (a detailed examination)

On the other hand, he clearly did not believe that writing has no philosophical value. His use of dramatic elements, including humour, draws the reader in. Plato is unmatched in his ability to re-create the experience of conversation.Narrowly speaking, the correspondence theory of truth is the view that truth is correspondence to, or with, a fact—a view that was advocated by Russell and Moore early in the 20th century.

Rationalism vs. Empiricism - Rationalism and empiricism were two philosophical schools in the 17th and 18th centuries, that were expressing opposite views on some subjects, including knowledge. Notes and References: Idries Shah, The Sufis, New York, Doubleday, pp.

xxvi. Roger Scruton, From Descartes to Wittgenstein: A Short History of Modern Philosophy. Contrasting and Comparing Plato and Aristotle Plato and Aristotle are, without any shred of doubt, two of the most influential philosophers of history.

It would suffice to argue that Plato’s philosophical teachings were, to a large extent, influenced by . In earliest times known by the title 'On the Soul', this dialog presents the Platonic Socrates' last hours before death, with Plato's proofs of the soul's immortality based on the argued-for premise that learning is recollection of Absolutes (Forms).

Reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, establishing and verifying facts, applying logic, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information. It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art and is normally considered to be a distinguishing.

Locke's Theory of Knowledge